NM_002878.4:c.29C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2
The NM_002878.4(RAD51D):c.29C>T(p.Pro10Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000342 in 1,460,204 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002878.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000484 AC: 12AN: 247692Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000819 AC XY: 11AN XY: 134280
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000342 AC: 50AN: 1460204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000537 AC XY: 39AN XY: 726484
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
The RAD51D c.29C>T (p.Pro10Leu) variant has been reported in the published literature in individuals with breast cancer and/or ovarian cancer (PMID: 29470806 (2018)) and a Lynch syndrome associated cancer and/or polyps (PMID: 25980754 (2015)). This variant has also been identified in an individual suspected of hereditary cancer syndrome (PMID: 34326862 (2021)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00039 (12/30606 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools (i.e., MutationTaster and PolyPhen-2) for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded conflicting predictions that this variant is benign or damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; Observed in multiple individuals with cancer in published literature, but familial segregation information, in vitro functional studies, and additional clinical information were not included (Yurgelun et al., 2015; Singh et al., 2018); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25980754, 29470806) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
- -
The p.P10L variant (also known as c.29C>T), located in coding exon 1 of the RAD51D gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 29. The proline at codon 10 is replaced by leucine, an amino acid with similar properties. This variant was observed in a study of 1010 unrelated Indian patients with breast and/or ovarian cancer (Singh J et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2018 Jul;170:189-196). This variant was also identified in a patient with breast and colorectal cancers as part of a large Canadian cohort study of 2870 individuals (Bhai P et al. Front Genet, 2021 Jul;12:698595). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4 Uncertain:2
This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 10 of the RAD51D protein (p.Pro10Leu). This variant is present in population databases (rs759505297, gnomAD 0.04%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast and/or ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome-associated cancer and/or colorectal polyps (PMID: 25980754, 29470806, 34326862). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 472596). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at