NM_002953.4:c.31C>G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_002953.4(RPS6KA1):c.31C>G(p.Pro11Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00255 in 1,433,776 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 34 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P11T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002953.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002953.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPS6KA1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.31C>G | p.Pro11Ala | missense | Exon 1 of 22 | ENSP00000363283.2 | Q15418-1 | ||
| RPS6KA1 | c.31C>G | p.Pro11Ala | missense | Exon 1 of 22 | ENSP00000622587.1 | ||||
| RPS6KA1 | c.31C>G | p.Pro11Ala | missense | Exon 1 of 22 | ENSP00000622586.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00222 AC: 337AN: 151540Hom.: 4 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00417 AC: 302AN: 72384 AF XY: 0.00405 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00259 AC: 3316AN: 1282130Hom.: 30 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00259 AC XY: 1639AN XY: 632638 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00222 AC: 337AN: 151646Hom.: 4 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00220 AC XY: 163AN XY: 74104 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at