NM_002968.3:c.3890T>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_002968.3(SALL1):c.3890T>C(p.Leu1297Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000658 in 152,026 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L1297R) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002968.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Townes-Brocks syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, G2P, Ambry Genetics
- Townes-Brocks syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002968.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SALL1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.3890T>C | p.Leu1297Pro | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000251020.4 | Q9NSC2-1 | ||
| SALL1 | TSL:1 | c.*327T>C | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000455582.1 | H3BQ32 | |||
| SALL1 | TSL:5 | c.3890T>C | p.Leu1297Pro | missense | Exon 4 of 4 | ENSP00000407914.2 | Q9NSC2-1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152026Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152026Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74250 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at