NM_003063.3:c.-65G>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_003063.3(SLN):c.-65G>C variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.58 in 1,067,646 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 180,634 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003063.3 5_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_003063.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLN | NM_003063.3 | MANE Select | c.-65G>C | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 2 of 2 | NP_003054.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLN | ENST00000305991.3 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.-65G>C | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000304707.2 | |||
| SLN | ENST00000525934.1 | TSL:3 | c.-65G>C | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000434189.1 | |||
| SLN | ENST00000531293.1 | TSL:4 | c.-65G>C | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000435380.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.603 AC: 91548AN: 151832Hom.: 28136 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.576 AC: 527292AN: 915696Hom.: 152460 Cov.: 12 AF XY: 0.570 AC XY: 272891AN XY: 479016 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.603 AC: 91641AN: 151950Hom.: 28174 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.610 AC XY: 45269AN XY: 74252 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at