NM_003310.5:c.835C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM2PP3_Moderate
The NM_003310.5(EIPR1):c.835C>T(p.Arg279Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000171 in 1,459,444 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003310.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_003310.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EIPR1 | MANE Select | c.835C>T | p.Arg279Cys | missense | Exon 8 of 9 | NP_003301.1 | Q53HC9 | ||
| EIPR1 | c.916C>T | p.Arg306Cys | missense | Exon 9 of 10 | NP_001317459.1 | A8MUM1 | |||
| EIPR1 | c.403C>T | p.Arg135Cys | missense | Exon 7 of 8 | NP_001317460.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EIPR1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.835C>T | p.Arg279Cys | missense | Exon 8 of 9 | ENSP00000371559.4 | Q53HC9 | ||
| EIPR1 | c.925C>T | p.Arg309Cys | missense | Exon 9 of 10 | ENSP00000534382.1 | ||||
| EIPR1 | TSL:5 | c.916C>T | p.Arg306Cys | missense | Exon 9 of 10 | ENSP00000381652.4 | A8MUM1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000120 AC: 3AN: 249040 AF XY: 0.00000741 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000171 AC: 25AN: 1459444Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000165 AC XY: 12AN XY: 726022 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at