NM_003476.5:c.10T>C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_003476.5(CSRP3):c.10T>C(p.Trp4Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0039 in 1,613,994 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 17 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0026 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0040 ( 16 hom. )

Consequence

CSRP3
NM_003476.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.40

Variant links:

Genes affected

CSRP3 (HGNC:2472): (cysteine and glycine rich protein 3) This gene encodes a member of the CSRP family of LIM domain proteins, which may be involved in regulatory processes important for development and cellular differentiation. The LIM/double zinc-finger motif found in this protein is found in a group of proteins with critical functions in gene regulation, cell growth, and somatic differentiation. Mutations in this gene are thought to cause heritable forms of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in humans. Alternatively spliced transcript variants with different 5' UTR, but encoding the same protein, have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CSRP3 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009798527).

BP6

Variant 11-19192439-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-19192439-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 8776.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=3, Likely_benign=8}. Variant chr11-19192439-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr11-19192439-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0026 (396/152286) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00463 (315/68020). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00421. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 183 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 16 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CSRP3	NM_003476.5 link	c.10T>C	p.Trp4Arg	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 6	ENST00000265968.9	NP_003467.1	P50461-1A2TDB8
CSRP3	NM_001369404.1 link	c.10T>C	p.Trp4Arg	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 5		NP_001356333.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CSRP3	ENST00000265968.9 link	c.10T>C	p.Trp4Arg	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 6	1	NM_003476.5	ENSP00000265968.3		P50461-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00260

AC:

396

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000627

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.0175

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00137

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000828

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000659

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00463

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00334

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00222

AC:

558

AN:

251372

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00228

AC XY:

310

AN XY:

135856

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000431

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000925

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000751

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00418

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00404

AC:

5901

AN:

1461708

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00394

AC XY:

2866

AN XY:

727180

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000358

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000961

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000765

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000765

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000842

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00500

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00275

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00260

AC:

396

AN:

152286

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00246

AC XY:

183

AN XY:

74460

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000625

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00137

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000829

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000659

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00463

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00331

Alfa

AF:

0.00373

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00284

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00917

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00441

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000455

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00536

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00236

AC:

287

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00403

EpiControl

AF:

0.00433

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:16

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 30, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Feb 11, 2019

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The variant, CSRP3 c.10T>C (p.Trp4Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0022 in 280268 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0042 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 170 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CSRP3 causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (2.5e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. In conflict with the population data, in vitro and in vivo functional studies showed that p.W4R completely disrupted T-cap binding, and a mouse model expressing p.W4R showed age- and gene dosage-dependent hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and heart failure phenotype (Knoll 2002, Knoll 2010). However, no human studies are available to date to confirm an effect in humans. Though this variant has been reported in the literature in several patients with either Hypertrophic- or Dilated Cardiomyopathy, it was also found in several controls, with a negative family history of heart disease (Geier 2008, Newman 2005). Moreover, the variant has been shown not to co-segregate with disease in multiple families (Geier 2008, Mohaptra 2003). Additionally, the variant has been reported to co-occur with multiple pathogenic/potentially pathogenic variants, including MYBPC3 F1113I, MYH7 T1377M, MYH7 I511T, MYBPC3 Q1233X and TNNT2 K210del (Bos 2006, Geier 2008, Mohaptra 2003), and it was noted that there was no correlation between the presence of the W4R variant and the severity / progression of the disease (Geier 2008). Six other clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation and classified the variant as benign (1x), likely benign (4x) or VUS (1x). Given the strong population and segregation studies data, this variant is likely not a disease-causing mutation in isolation, but functional studies indicate that it affects function and could act as a phenotypic modifier in cardiomyopathies. Taken together, this variant was classified as likely benign, until additional information is available. -

Apr 08, 2019

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

proposed classification - variant undergoing re-assessment, contact laboratory -

May 23, 2017

Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:5

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 10, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 01, 2023

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

CSRP3: BS2 -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Zaffran Lab, Genetics of Cardiac Diseases Laboratory, Marseille Medical Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

Jun 06, 2023

Molecular Genetics, Royal Melbourne Hospital

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 12

Uncertain:1

Laboratory of Genetics and Molecular Cardiology, University of São Paulo

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1M

Uncertain:1

Sep 15, 2008

OMIM

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: literature only

- -

Cardiomyopathy

Uncertain:1

Sep 29, 2017

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

CSRP3-related disorder

Benign:1

Sep 30, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy;C0520806:Sudden unexplained death

Benign:1

Oct 10, 2018

Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology, Centenary Institute

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

This variant has been identified as part of our research program. Refer to the 'condition' field for the phenotype of the proband(s) identified with this variant. For further information please feel free to contact us. -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1M;C2677491:Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 12

Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Primary dilated cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Jun 24, 2013

Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Aug 30, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.98

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.056

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.15

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.49

T;.;.;T;T;.

Eigen

Uncertain

0.62

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.66

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.97

.;D;D;.;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.033

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0098

T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.44

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.0

M;.;.;M;M;.

PrimateAI

Pathogenic

0.85

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.3

D;.;.;.;D;.

REVEL

Uncertain

0.47

Sift

Pathogenic

0.0

D;.;.;.;D;.

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;.;.;.;D;.

Polyphen

0.89

P;.;.;P;P;.

Vest4

0.74

MutPred

0.78

Gain of disorder (P = 0.003);Gain of disorder (P = 0.003);Gain of disorder (P = 0.003);Gain of disorder (P = 0.003);Gain of disorder (P = 0.003);Gain of disorder (P = 0.003);

MVP

0.88

MPC

0.30

ClinPred

0.042

GERP RS

6.0

Varity_R

0.75

gMVP

0.54

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over