NM_004096.5:c.95A>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BP4
The NM_004096.5(EIF4EBP2):c.95A>C(p.His32Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000658 in 152,032 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004096.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004096.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EIF4EBP2 | NM_004096.5 | MANE Select | c.95A>C | p.His32Pro | missense | Exon 1 of 3 | NP_004087.1 | Q13542 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EIF4EBP2 | ENST00000373218.5 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.95A>C | p.His32Pro | missense | Exon 1 of 3 | ENSP00000362314.4 | Q13542 | |
| EIF4EBP2 | ENST00000892260.1 | c.95A>C | p.His32Pro | missense | Exon 1 of 2 | ENSP00000562319.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151924Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR AF: 0.00000967 AC: 14AN: 1447046Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000833 AC XY: 6AN XY: 719974 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152032Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74332 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at