NM_004168.4:c.309A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_004168.4(SDHA):​c.309A>G​(p.Ala103Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.139 in 1,591,882 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 19,019 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.24 ( 6846 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.13 ( 12173 hom. )

Consequence

SDHA
NM_004168.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.652

Publications

19 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SDHA (HGNC:10680): (succinate dehydrogenase complex flavoprotein subunit A) This gene encodes a major catalytic subunit of succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, a complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The complex is composed of four nuclear-encoded subunits and is localized in the mitochondrial inner membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with a form of mitochondrial respiratory chain deficiency known as Leigh Syndrome. A pseudogene has been identified on chromosome 3q29. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]
SDHA Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma syndrome 5
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Illumina, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
  • neurodegeneration with ataxia and late-onset optic atrophy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • Leigh syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
  • familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • gastrointestinal stromal tumor
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Leigh syndrome with leukodystrophy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • mitochondrial complex II deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • dilated cardiomyopathy 1GG
    Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).
BP6
Variant 5-224518-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-224518-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 130280.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.652 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.519 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SDHANM_004168.4 linkc.309A>G p.Ala103Ala synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 15 ENST00000264932.11 NP_004159.2 P31040-1A0A024QZ30

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SDHAENST00000264932.11 linkc.309A>G p.Ala103Ala synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 15 1 NM_004168.4 ENSP00000264932.6 P31040-1
ENSG00000286001ENST00000651543.1 linkn.309A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 3 of 24 ENSP00000499215.1 A0A494C1T6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.240
AC:
36481
AN:
152022
Hom.:
6820
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.524
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.306
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.221
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.166
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0563
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0886
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0821
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.206
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.124
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.233
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.150
AC:
37476
AN:
250446
AF XY:
0.141
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.538
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.185
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.160
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0603
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0856
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.126
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.149
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.128
AC:
184521
AN:
1439742
Hom.:
12173
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.126
AC XY:
90263
AN XY:
716870
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.519
AC:
16785
AN:
32346
American (AMR)
AF:
0.178
AC:
7842
AN:
44076
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.157
AC:
4073
AN:
25874
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0471
AC:
1866
AN:
39640
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0867
AC:
7436
AN:
85718
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0878
AC:
4688
AN:
53368
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.140
AC:
633
AN:
4512
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.121
AC:
132398
AN:
1094712
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.148
AC:
8800
AN:
59496
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.381
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6479
12959
19438
25918
32397
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4986
9972
14958
19944
24930
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.240
AC:
36552
AN:
152140
Hom.:
6846
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.235
AC XY:
17451
AN XY:
74390
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.524
AC:
21732
AN:
41440
American (AMR)
AF:
0.220
AC:
3366
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.166
AC:
574
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0558
AC:
289
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0889
AC:
429
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0821
AC:
871
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.211
AC:
62
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.124
AC:
8466
AN:
68010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.230
AC:
484
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1165
2329
3494
4658
5823
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
326
652
978
1304
1630
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.181
Hom.:
1597
Bravo
AF:
0.267
Asia WGS
AF:
0.114
AC:
399
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Jan 03, 2020
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified Benign:2
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma syndrome 5 Benign:2
Feb 28, 2025
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Jan 08, 2025
Hereditary Cancer Laboratory, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BA1+BP65+BP7 -

Nov 18, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Leigh syndrome Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma syndrome 5;C5700310:Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.68
CADD
Benign
4.1
DANN
Benign
0.32
PhyloP100
0.65
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.8
Mutation Taster
=86/14
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1139424; hg19: chr5-224633; COSMIC: COSV53765839; COSMIC: COSV53765839; API