NM_004314.3:c.770T>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_004314.3(ART1):c.770T>C(p.Leu257Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.656 in 1,610,532 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 351,546 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004314.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004314.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ART1 | NM_004314.3 | MANE Select | c.770T>C | p.Leu257Pro | missense | Exon 3 of 5 | NP_004305.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ART1 | ENST00000250693.2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.770T>C | p.Leu257Pro | missense | Exon 3 of 5 | ENSP00000250693.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.621 AC: 94413AN: 151942Hom.: 30398 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.654 AC: 162213AN: 247878 AF XY: 0.650 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.660 AC: 962078AN: 1458470Hom.: 321128 Cov.: 79 AF XY: 0.658 AC XY: 477191AN XY: 725648 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.621 AC: 94480AN: 152062Hom.: 30418 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.622 AC XY: 46212AN XY: 74308 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at