NM_004431.5:c.*443T>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_004431.5(EPHA2):c.*443T>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.015 in 189,478 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 92 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004431.5 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPHA2 | NM_004431.5 | c.*443T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 17 of 17 | ENST00000358432.8 | NP_004422.2 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0177 AC: 2693AN: 152220Hom.: 88 Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00355 AC: 132AN: 37140Hom.: 3 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00339 AC XY: 65AN XY: 19168
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0178 AC: 2709AN: 152338Hom.: 89 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0173 AC XY: 1287AN XY: 74496
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Cataract 6 multiple types Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at