NM_005188.4:c.2583C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_005188.4(CBL):c.2583C>T(p.Ile861Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000991 in 1,614,040 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000096 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CBL
NM_005188.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.884

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CBL (HGNC:1541): (Cbl proto-oncogene) This gene is a proto-oncogene that encodes a RING finger E3 ubiquitin ligase. The encoded protein is one of the enzymes required for targeting substrates for degradation by the proteasome. This protein mediates the transfer of ubiquitin from ubiquitin conjugating enzymes (E2) to specific substrates. This protein also contains an N-terminal phosphotyrosine binding domain that allows it to interact with numerous tyrosine-phosphorylated substrates and target them for proteasome degradation. As such it functions as a negative regulator of many signal transduction pathways. This gene has been found to be mutated or translocated in many cancers including acute myeloid leukaemia, and expansion of CGG repeats in the 5' UTR has been associated with Jacobsen syndrome. Mutations in this gene are also the cause of Noonan syndrome-like disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2016]

CBL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

CBL-related disorder
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp
juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Noonan syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

CBL links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.39).

BP6

Variant 11-119299643-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-119299643-C-T is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 45206.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.884 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 14 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005188.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	CBL	NM_005188.4	MANE Select	c.2583C>T	p.Ile861Ile	synonymous	Exon 16 of 16	NP_005179.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
CBL	ENST00000264033.6	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.2583C>T	p.Ile861Ile	synonymous	Exon 16 of 16	ENSP00000264033.3
CBL	ENST00000634840.1	TSL:5	c.2451C>T	p.Ile817Ile	synonymous	Exon 15 of 15	ENSP00000489324.1
CBL	ENST00000634586.1	TSL:5	c.2575+8C>T		splice_region intron	N/A	ENSP00000489218.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152150

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000192

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000479

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00000398

AC:

AN:

251460

AF XY:

0.00

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000958

AC:

AN:

1461890

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000124

AC XY:

AN XY:

727248

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000239

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000187

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000360

AC:

AN:

1112008

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.471

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152150

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000135

AC XY:

AN XY:

74330

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41428

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15278

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000192

AC:

AN:

5196

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10616

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68020

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000479

AC:

AN:

2088

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.500

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000302

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:1

May 09, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Ile861Ile in exon 16 of CBL: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and it is not located wi thin the splice consensus sequence.

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Jan 27, 2023

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

RASopathy

Benign:1

Dec 17, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.39

CADD

Benign

3.9

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.78

PhyloP100

-0.88

Mutation Taster

=97/3

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over