NM_005236.3:c.2463A>G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_005236.3(ERCC4):c.2463A>G(p.Pro821Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00124 in 1,614,184 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 29 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0065 ( 14 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00069 ( 15 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC4
NM_005236.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.66

Variant links:

Genes affected

ERCC4 (HGNC:3436): (ERCC excision repair 4, endonuclease catalytic subunit) The protein encoded by this gene forms a complex with ERCC1 and is involved in the 5' incision made during nucleotide excision repair. This complex is a structure specific DNA repair endonuclease that interacts with EME1. Defects in this gene are a cause of xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group F (XP-F), or xeroderma pigmentosum VI (XP6).[provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]

ERCC4 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).

BP6

Variant 16-13948059-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-13948059-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 240123.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.66 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00646 (984/152298) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0221 (920/41558). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.021. There are 14 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 469 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 14 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ERCC4	NM_005236.3 link	c.2463A>G	p.Pro821Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 11	ENST00000311895.8	NP_005227.1	Q92889-1A0A1W1GSK9
ERCC4	XM_011522424.4 link	c.2601A>G	p.Pro867Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 12 of 12		XP_011520726.1	A0A804HKF9
ERCC4	XM_047433774.1 link	c.1674A>G	p.Pro558Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 8		XP_047289730.1
ERCC4	XM_011522427.2 link	c.1113A>G	p.Pro371Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 6		XP_011520729.1	B4DXD8

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ERCC4	ENST00000311895.8 link	c.2463A>G	p.Pro821Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 11	1	NM_005236.3	ENSP00000310520.7		Q92889-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00645

AC:

982

AN:

152180

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0222

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00275

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000176

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00430

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00187

AC:

470

AN:

251268

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00144

AC XY:

195

AN XY:

135786

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0254

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00113

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000704

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00131

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000692

AC:

1012

AN:

1461886

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000571

AC XY:

415

AN XY:

727244

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0225

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00127

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000464

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000755

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00172

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00646

AC:

984

AN:

152298

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00630

AC XY:

469

AN XY:

74480

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0221

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00275

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000176

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00425

Alfa

AF:

0.00356

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00787

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00173

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

May 01, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cockayne syndrome;C0268140:Xeroderma pigmentosum, group F;C3808988:Fanconi anemia complementation group Q

Benign:1

Feb 01, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

ERCC4-related disorder

Benign:1

Sep 16, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Xeroderma pigmentosum, group F

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.84

CADD

Benign

0.15

DANN

Benign

0.60

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over