NM_005343.4:c.477G>A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_005343.4(HRAS):c.477G>A(p.Leu159Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00356 in 1,613,094 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 17 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0021 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0037 ( 17 hom. )

Consequence

HRAS
NM_005343.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.858

Variant links:

Genes affected

HRAS (HGNC:5173): (HRas proto-oncogene, GTPase) This gene belongs to the Ras oncogene family, whose members are related to the transforming genes of mammalian sarcoma retroviruses. The products encoded by these genes function in signal transduction pathways. These proteins can bind GTP and GDP, and they have intrinsic GTPase activity. This protein undergoes a continuous cycle of de- and re-palmitoylation, which regulates its rapid exchange between the plasma membrane and the Golgi apparatus. Mutations in this gene cause Costello syndrome, a disease characterized by increased growth at the prenatal stage, growth deficiency at the postnatal stage, predisposition to tumor formation, cognitive disability, skin and musculoskeletal abnormalities, distinctive facial appearance and cardiovascular abnormalities. Defects in this gene are implicated in a variety of cancers, including bladder cancer, follicular thyroid cancer, and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Multiple transcript variants, which encode different isoforms, have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

HRAS links:

LRRC56 (HGNC:25430): (leucine rich repeat containing 56) Predicted to be involved in cell projection organization. Predicted to be located in cilium. Implicated in primary ciliary dyskinesia 39. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

LRRC56 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).

BP6

Variant 11-532729-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-532729-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 40446.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr11-532729-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.858 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00209 (319/152362) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00351 (239/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00315. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 148 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 319 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
HRAS	NM_005343.4 link	c.477G>A	p.Leu159Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 6	ENST00000311189.8	NP_005334.1	P01112-1X5D945
HRAS	NM_176795.5 link	c.*46G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 6 of 6	ENST00000417302.7	NP_789765.1	P01112-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
HRAS	ENST00000311189.8 link	c.477G>A	p.Leu159Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 6	1	NM_005343.4	ENSP00000309845.7		P01112-1
HRAS	ENST00000417302 link	c.*46G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 6 of 6	5	NM_176795.5	ENSP00000388246.1		P01112-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00210

AC:

319

AN:

152244

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000820

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00236

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000941

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00351

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00430

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00150

AC:

373

AN:

248558

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00156

AC XY:

210

AN XY:

134872

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000680

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00208

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00251

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00180

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00371

AC:

5425

AN:

1460732

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00355

AC XY:

2579

AN XY:

726706

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000866

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00190

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000172

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00462

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00268

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00209

AC:

319

AN:

152362

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00199

AC XY:

148

AN XY:

74502

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000818

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00235

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.0000941

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00351

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00425

Alfa

AF:

0.00231

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00226

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00278

EpiControl

AF:

0.00338

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:14

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:6

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

HRAS: BP4, BP7, BS2 -

Aug 12, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

not specified

Benign:3

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 15, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 22, 2011

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Leu159Leu in Exon 05B of HRAS: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence and has been identified in 0.4% (27/7020) of Euro pean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs140060409). -

Costello syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 31, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Nov 05, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Jul 22, 2021

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

RASopathy

Benign:1

Apr 18, 2017

ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel

Significance: Benign

Review Status: reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method: curation

The filtering allele frequency of the c.477G>A (p.Leu159=) variant in the HRAS gene is 0.185% (140/65296) of European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29493581) -

Noonan syndrome and Noonan-related syndrome

Benign:1

Jun 25, 2021

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.49

CADD

Benign

7.0

DANN

Benign

0.79

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over