NM_005373.3:c.173C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 1P and 5B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_005373.3(MPL):c.173C>T(p.Ala58Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000787 in 1,614,152 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A58A) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005373.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- thrombocythemia 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
- congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopeniaInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
- congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- familial thrombocytosisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hereditary isolated aplastic anemiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005373.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPL | NM_005373.3 | MANE Select | c.173C>T | p.Ala58Val | missense | Exon 2 of 12 | NP_005364.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPL | ENST00000372470.9 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.173C>T | p.Ala58Val | missense | Exon 2 of 12 | ENSP00000361548.3 | ||
| MPL | ENST00000413998.7 | TSL:1 | c.152C>T | p.Ala51Val | missense | Exon 2 of 12 | ENSP00000414004.3 | ||
| MPL | ENST00000638732.1 | TSL:1 | n.173C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 2 of 10 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000105 AC: 16AN: 152188Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000135 AC: 34AN: 251294 AF XY: 0.000133 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000759 AC: 111AN: 1461846Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000701 AC XY: 51AN XY: 727226 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000105 AC: 16AN: 152306Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000806 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74474 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
MPL-related disorder Uncertain:1
The MPL c.173C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Ala58Val. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature as a germline variant. This variant is reported in 0.15% of alleles in individuals of East Asian descent in gnomAD which may be too frequent for an unreported disease-causing variant. This variant has conflicting interpretation in ClinVar ranging from uncertain to likely benign (https://preview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/412015/). Although we suspect that this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence.
Primary myelofibrosis;C1327915:Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia;C3275998:Thrombocythemia 2 Uncertain:1
Primary myelofibrosis;C3275998:Thrombocythemia 2;C5882667:Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia 1 Uncertain:1
Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia Uncertain:1
Essential thrombocythemia;C1327915:Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia Benign:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at