NM_005422.4:c.2795T>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_005422.4(TECTA):c.2795T>C(p.Val932Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.219 in 1,613,878 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 39,283 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V932L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005422.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005422.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TECTA | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.2795T>C | p.Val932Ala | missense | Exon 10 of 24 | ENSP00000376543.1 | O75443 | ||
| TECTA | TSL:1 | c.2795T>C | p.Val932Ala | missense | Exon 9 of 23 | ENSP00000264037.2 | O75443 | ||
| TECTA | c.2795T>C | p.Val932Ala | missense | Exon 10 of 24 | ENSP00000493855.1 | A0A2R8YDL0 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.205 AC: 31090AN: 152012Hom.: 3230 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.217 AC: 54409AN: 251140 AF XY: 0.215 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.220 AC: 322267AN: 1461748Hom.: 36052 Cov.: 38 AF XY: 0.220 AC XY: 159741AN XY: 727166 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.204 AC: 31091AN: 152130Hom.: 3231 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.204 AC XY: 15171AN XY: 74346 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at