NM_006096.4:c.64-6T>C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_006096.4(NDRG1):​c.64-6T>C variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.567 in 1,612,932 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 265,351 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.64 ( 32790 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.56 ( 232561 hom. )

Consequence

NDRG1
NM_006096.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.000008000
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.573
Variant links:
Genes affected
NDRG1 (HGNC:7679): (N-myc downstream regulated 1) This gene is a member of the N-myc downregulated gene family which belongs to the alpha/beta hydrolase superfamily. The protein encoded by this gene is a cytoplasmic protein involved in stress responses, hormone responses, cell growth, and differentiation. The encoded protein is necessary for p53-mediated caspase activation and apoptosis. Mutations in this gene are a cause of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4D, and expression of this gene may be a prognostic indicator for several types of cancer. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been observed for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).
BP6
Variant 8-133280273-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-133280273-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 259916.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-133280273-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.855 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NDRG1NM_006096.4 linkc.64-6T>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 2 of 15 ENST00000323851.13 NP_006087.2 Q92597-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NDRG1ENST00000323851.13 linkc.64-6T>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 2 of 15 1 NM_006096.4 ENSP00000319977.8 Q92597-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.640
AC:
97248
AN:
151950
Hom.:
32741
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.862
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.499
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.534
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.641
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.463
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.410
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.579
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.649
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.570
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.648
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.556
AC:
139553
AN:
251082
Hom.:
40290
AF XY:
0.549
AC XY:
74453
AN XY:
135720
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.870
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.469
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.635
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.465
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.435
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.577
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.572
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.577
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.560
AC:
817722
AN:
1460864
Hom.:
232561
Cov.:
43
AF XY:
0.555
AC XY:
403631
AN XY:
726762
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.879
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.478
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.643
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.468
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.438
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.580
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.562
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.582
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.640
AC:
97347
AN:
152068
Hom.:
32790
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.632
AC XY:
46944
AN XY:
74330
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.862
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.534
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.641
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.463
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.409
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.579
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.570
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.645
Alfa
AF:
0.598
Hom.:
23991
Bravo
AF:
0.653
Asia WGS
AF:
0.507
AC:
1765
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.575
EpiControl
AF:
0.575

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 20, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 26, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4D Benign:3
Jul 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4 Benign:2
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
-
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.73
CADD
Benign
12
DANN
Benign
0.49
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.0000080
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2272653; hg19: chr8-134292516; COSMIC: COSV60484172; API