NM_006158.5:c.855C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_006158.5(NEFL):c.855C>T(p.Thr285Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00035 in 1,613,850 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0020 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00018 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

NEFL
NM_006158.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.11

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

NEFL (HGNC:7739): (neurofilament light chain) Neurofilaments are type IV intermediate filament heteropolymers composed of light, medium, and heavy chains. Neurofilaments comprise the axoskeleton and they functionally maintain the neuronal caliber. They may also play a role in intracellular transport to axons and dendrites. This gene encodes the light chain neurofilament protein. Mutations in this gene cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease types 1F (CMT1F) and 2E (CMT2E), disorders of the peripheral nervous system that are characterized by distinct neuropathies. A pseudogene has been identified on chromosome Y. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

NEFL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1F
Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2E
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2B5
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

NEFL links:

ENSG00000272157 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000272157 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.66).

BP6

Variant 8-24955661-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-24955661-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 383727.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.11 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.002 (305/152194) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00713 (296/41542). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00646. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 154 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NEFL	NM_006158.5 link	c.855C>T	p.Thr285Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 4	ENST00000610854.2	NP_006149.2	P07196

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NEFL	ENST00000610854.2 link	c.855C>T	p.Thr285Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 4	1	NM_006158.5	ENSP00000482169.2	P07196
NEFL	ENST00000615973.1 link	n.1061C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 1	6
ENSG00000272157	ENST00000607735.3 link	n.-30G>A		upstream_gene_variant		6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00200

AC:

304

AN:

152076

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00712

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000458

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000417

AC:

104

AN:

249148

AF XY:

0.000333

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00640

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000178

AC:

260

AN:

1461656

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000133

AC XY:

AN XY:

727124

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00699

AC:

234

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000134

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26126

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53364

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000180

AC:

AN:

1111864

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000282

AC:

AN:

60374

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.492

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00200

AC:

305

AN:

152194

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00207

AC XY:

154

AN XY:

74398

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00713

AC:

296

AN:

41542

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000458

AC:

AN:

15296

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5156

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4820

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10604

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

67992

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.496

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000923

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00222

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Feb 09, 2017

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 03, 2017

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Benign:1

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2E

Benign:1

Dec 23, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Sep 01, 2020

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.66

CADD

Benign

3.9

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.95

PhyloP100

-1.1

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over