NM_006206.6:c.995T>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4BS2
The NM_006206.6(PDGFRA):c.995T>C(p.Val332Ala) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000342 in 1,461,882 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V332D) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006206.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- gastrointestinal stromal tumorInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- polyps, multiple and recurrent inflammatory fibroid, gastrointestinalInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, G2P
- congenital heart diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
- isolated cleft palateInheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_006206.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDGFRA | NM_006206.6 | MANE Select | c.995T>C | p.Val332Ala | missense | Exon 7 of 23 | NP_006197.1 | ||
| PDGFRA | NM_001347828.2 | c.1070T>C | p.Val357Ala | missense | Exon 8 of 24 | NP_001334757.1 | |||
| PDGFRA | NM_001347830.2 | c.1034T>C | p.Val345Ala | missense | Exon 7 of 23 | NP_001334759.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDGFRA | ENST00000257290.10 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.995T>C | p.Val332Ala | missense | Exon 7 of 23 | ENSP00000257290.5 | ||
| PDGFRA | ENST00000509092.5 | TSL:1 | n.813T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 6 of 15 | ||||
| PDGFRA | ENST00000509490.5 | TSL:1 | n.995T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 7 of 18 | ENSP00000424218.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000342 AC: 5AN: 1461882Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 727238 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at