NM_006231.4:c.4450A>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_006231.4(POLE):āc.4450A>Cā(p.Ile1484Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000026 in 1,613,902 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006231.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152182Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000399 AC: 10AN: 250680Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000738 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135504
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000253 AC: 37AN: 1461720Hom.: 0 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.0000165 AC XY: 12AN XY: 727138
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152182Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74352
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
- -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
not specified Uncertain:1
- -
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12;C3554576:Facial dysmorphism-immunodeficiency-livedo-short stature syndrome Uncertain:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at