NM_006231.4:c.4603G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_006231.4(POLE):c.4603G>A(p.Gly1535Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000658 in 1,611,428 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006231.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- POLE-related polyposis and colorectal cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- facial dysmorphism-immunodeficiency-livedo-short stature syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- intrauterine growth retardation, metaphyseal dysplasia, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, genital anomalies, and immunodeficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P
- IMAGe syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Polymerase proofreading-related adenomatous polyposisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000920 AC: 14AN: 152204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000889 AC: 22AN: 247354 AF XY: 0.0000896 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000630 AC: 92AN: 1459224Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000482 AC XY: 35AN XY: 725946 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000920 AC: 14AN: 152204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000672 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74358 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12 Uncertain:2
This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -
- -
not provided Uncertain:2
In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in individuals undergoing multigene panel testing (Mur et al., 2020); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32792570) -
This sequence change replaces glycine, which is neutral and non-polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 1535 of the POLE protein (p.Gly1535Ser). This variant is present in population databases (rs138564205, gnomAD 0.03%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with gastric cancer (PMID: 34326862). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 240530). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt POLE protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant summary: POLE c.4603G>A (p.Gly1535Ser) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8.9e-05 in 247354 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in POLE causing Facial Dysmorphism, Immunodeficiency, Livedo, And Short Stature (8.9e-05 vs 0.0011), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.4603G>A has been reported in the presumed heterozygous state in the literature in individuals affected with various cancers, without strong evidence for causality (example, Mur_2020, Bhai_2021, de Oliveira_2022). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with POLE-related conditions. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 32792570, 34326862, 33872653, 35534704). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 240530). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12;C3554576:Facial dysmorphism-immunodeficiency-livedo-short stature syndrome Uncertain:1
- -
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12;C3554576:Facial dysmorphism-immunodeficiency-livedo-short stature syndrome;C5193036:Intrauterine growth retardation, metaphyseal dysplasia, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, genital anomalies, and immunodeficiency Uncertain:1
- -
POLE-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at