NM_006258.4:c.1080T>C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_006258.4(PRKG1):c.1080T>C(p.Tyr360Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000914 in 1,613,344 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0048 ( 6 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00051 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

PRKG1
NM_006258.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0550

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

PRKG1 (HGNC:9414): (protein kinase cGMP-dependent 1) Mammals have three different isoforms of cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase (Ialpha, Ibeta, and II). These PRKG isoforms act as key mediators of the nitric oxide/cGMP signaling pathway and are important components of many signal transduction processes in diverse cell types. This PRKG1 gene on human chromosome 10 encodes the soluble Ialpha and Ibeta isoforms of PRKG by alternative transcript splicing. A separate gene on human chromosome 4, PRKG2, encodes the membrane-bound PRKG isoform II. The PRKG1 proteins play a central role in regulating cardiovascular and neuronal functions in addition to relaxing smooth muscle tone, preventing platelet aggregation, and modulating cell growth. This gene is most strongly expressed in all types of smooth muscle, platelets, cerebellar Purkinje cells, hippocampal neurons, and the lateral amygdala. Isoforms Ialpha and Ibeta have identical cGMP-binding and catalytic domains but differ in their leucine/isoleucine zipper and autoinhibitory sequences and therefore differ in their dimerization substrates and kinase enzyme activity. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2011]

PRKG1 links:

PRKG1-AS1 (HGNC:45029): (PRKG1 antisense RNA 1)

PRKG1-AS1 links:

LOC124902425 (HGNC:):

LOC124902425 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).

BP6

Variant 10-52251573-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-52251573-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 240639.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.055 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00481 (733/152278) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0165 (687/41558). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0155. There are 6 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 341 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 733 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PRKG1	NM_006258.4 link	c.1080T>C	p.Tyr360Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 18	ENST00000373980.11	NP_006249.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PRKG1	ENST00000373980.11 link	c.1080T>C	p.Tyr360Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 18	1	NM_006258.4	ENSP00000363092.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00481

AC:

732

AN:

152160

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0166

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00203

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00142

AC:

357

AN:

250814

AF XY:

0.00105

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0196

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000724

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000618

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00115

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000508

AC:

742

AN:

1461066

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000435

AC XY:

316

AN XY:

726838

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0154

AC:

514

AN:

33428

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000962

AC:

AN:

44702

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26114

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39686

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000464

AC:

AN:

86232

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53384

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000694

AC:

AN:

5762

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000837

AC:

AN:

1111416

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00139

AC:

AN:

60342

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.486

Heterozygous variant carriers

121

162

202

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00481

AC:

733

AN:

152278

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00458

AC XY:

341

AN XY:

74458

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0165

AC:

687

AN:

41558

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00203

AC:

AN:

15276

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5166

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000414

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10622

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00473

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.500

Heterozygous variant carriers

105

140

175

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00308

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00592

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000546

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Aortic aneurysm, familial thoracic 8

Benign:3

Nov 06, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 15, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified

Benign:2

Nov 15, 2016

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Jul 21, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:2

Dec 01, 2022

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 06, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

not provided

Benign:1

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.55

CADD

Benign

3.0

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.61

PhyloP100

-0.055

Mutation Taster

=91/9

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.040

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over