NM_006261.5:c.174G>A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_006261.5(PROP1):c.174G>A(p.Pro58Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00406 in 1,613,438 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 264 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P58P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.022 ( 146 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0021 ( 118 hom. )

Consequence

PROP1
NM_006261.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.36

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

PROP1 (HGNC:9455): (PROP paired-like homeobox 1) This gene encodes a paired-like homeodomain transcription factor in the developing pituitary gland. Expression occurs prior to and is required for expression of pou domain transcription factor 1, which is responsible for pituitary development and hormone expression. Mutations in this gene have been associated with combined pituitary hormone deficiency-2 as well as deficiencies in luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, growth hormone, prolactin, and thyroid-stimulating hormone. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2011]

PROP1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

pituitary hormone deficiency, combined, 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
combined pituitary hormone deficiencies, genetic form
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
hypothyroidism due to deficient transcription factors involved in pituitary development or function
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
panhypopituitarism
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

PROP1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).

BP6

Variant 5-177994274-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-177994274-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 36699.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.36 with no splicing effect.

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0762 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PROP1	NM_006261.5 link	c.174G>A	p.Pro58Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 3	ENST00000308304.2	NP_006252.4

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PROP1	ENST00000308304.2 link	c.174G>A	p.Pro58Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 3	1	NM_006261.5	ENSP00000311290.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0224

AC:

3412

AN:

152062

Hom.:

146

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0785

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00812

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000622

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000206

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0110

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00585

AC:

1453

AN:

248574

AF XY:

0.00415

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0841

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00241

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000627

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00231

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00214

AC:

3130

AN:

1461256

Hom.:

118

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00180

AC XY:

1311

AN XY:

726844

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0800

AC:

2678

AN:

33476

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00296

AC:

132

AN:

44670

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26104

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39680

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000162

AC:

AN:

86224

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53354

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00121

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000495

AC:

AN:

1111628

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00404

AC:

244

AN:

60352

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.490

Heterozygous variant carriers

177

354

531

708

885

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

172

258

344

430

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0225

AC:

3418

AN:

152182

Hom.:

146

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0214

AC XY:

1590

AN XY:

74406

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0784

AC:

3255

AN:

41518

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00810

AC:

124

AN:

15300

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5168

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000415

AC:

AN:

4816

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10618

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000206

AC:

AN:

67976

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0109

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.499

Heterozygous variant carriers

157

313

470

626

783

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

128

160

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0199

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0262

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00404

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000594

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:4

Aug 30, 2018

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 19, 2017

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Pituitary hormone deficiency, combined, 2

Benign:2

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Dec 05, 2019

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Combined pituitary hormone deficiencies, genetic form

Benign:1

Aug 18, 2011

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.79

CADD

Benign

1.6

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.77

PhyloP100

-4.4

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism (auto)

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over