NM_006383.4:c.523A>G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BP4
The NM_006383.4(CIB2):c.523A>G(p.Lys175Glu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000657 in 152,200 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. K175Q) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006383.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Usher syndrome type 1JInheritance: Unknown, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 48Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, PanelApp Australia
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Usher syndrome type 1Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152200Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 34
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152200Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74350 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at