NM_006734.4:c.-527-11008A>G
Variant names: 
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBA1
The NM_006734.4(HIVEP2):c.-527-11008A>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.581 in 152,082 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 27,024 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
 Genomes: 𝑓 0.58   (  27024   hom.,  cov: 32) 
Consequence
 HIVEP2
NM_006734.4 intron
NM_006734.4 intron
Scores
 2
Clinical Significance
 Not reported in ClinVar 
Conservation
 PhyloP100:  0.973  
Publications
3 publications found 
Genes affected
 HIVEP2  (HGNC:4921):  (HIVEP zinc finger 2) This gene encodes a member of a family of closely related, large, zinc finger-containing transcription factors. The encoded protein regulates transcription by binding to regulatory regions of various cellular and viral genes that maybe involved in growth, development and metastasis. The protein contains the ZAS domain comprised of two widely separated regions of zinc finger motifs, a stretch of highly acidic amino acids and a serine/threonine-rich sequence. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2012] 
HIVEP2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 43Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Illumina, G2P
 - autosomal dominant non-syndromic intellectual disabilityInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
 
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.33). 
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.673  is higher than 0.05. 
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes   AF:  0.581  AC: 88285AN: 151966Hom.:  27007  Cov.: 32 show subpopulations 
GnomAD3 genomes 
 AF: 
AC: 
88285
AN: 
151966
Hom.: 
Cov.: 
32
Gnomad AFR 
 AF: 
Gnomad AMI 
 AF: 
Gnomad AMR 
 AF: 
Gnomad ASJ 
 AF: 
Gnomad EAS 
 AF: 
Gnomad SAS 
 AF: 
Gnomad FIN 
 AF: 
Gnomad MID 
 AF: 
Gnomad NFE 
 AF: 
Gnomad OTH 
 AF: 
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome   AF:  0.581  AC: 88345AN: 152082Hom.:  27024  Cov.: 32 AF XY:  0.583  AC XY: 43341AN XY: 74328 show subpopulations 
GnomAD4 genome 
 AF: 
AC: 
88345
AN: 
152082
Hom.: 
Cov.: 
32
 AF XY: 
AC XY: 
43341
AN XY: 
74328
show subpopulations 
African (AFR) 
 AF: 
AC: 
16471
AN: 
41476
American (AMR) 
 AF: 
AC: 
7721
AN: 
15286
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ) 
 AF: 
AC: 
2243
AN: 
3472
East Asian (EAS) 
 AF: 
AC: 
3017
AN: 
5162
South Asian (SAS) 
 AF: 
AC: 
3149
AN: 
4828
European-Finnish (FIN) 
 AF: 
AC: 
7648
AN: 
10560
Middle Eastern (MID) 
 AF: 
AC: 
177
AN: 
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE) 
 AF: 
AC: 
46115
AN: 
67980
Other (OTH) 
 AF: 
AC: 
1230
AN: 
2112
 Allele Balance Distribution 
 Red line indicates average allele balance 
 Average allele balance: 0.503 
Heterozygous variant carriers
 0 
 1784 
 3568 
 5353 
 7137 
 8921 
 0.00 
 0.20 
 0.40 
 0.60 
 0.80 
 0.95 
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
 0 
 750 
 1500 
 2250 
 3000 
 3750 
 <30 
 30-35 
 35-40 
 40-45 
 45-50 
 50-55 
 55-60 
 60-65 
 65-70 
 70-75 
 75-80 
 >80 
Age
Alfa 
 AF: 
Hom.: 
Bravo 
 AF: 
Asia WGS 
 AF: 
AC: 
2175
AN: 
3478
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source: 
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
 BayesDel_noAF 
 Benign 
 DANN 
 Benign 
 PhyloP100 
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
 SpliceAI score (max) 
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at 
Publications
 You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.