NM_006765.4:c.709-2679T>C
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_006765.4(TUSC3):c.709-2679T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.138 in 151,850 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3,057 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.14 ( 3057 hom., cov: 32)
Consequence
TUSC3
NM_006765.4 intron
NM_006765.4 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.15
Publications
1 publications found
Genes affected
TUSC3 (HGNC:30242): (tumor suppressor candidate 3) This gene encodes a protein that has been associated with several biological functions including cellular magnesium uptake, protein glycosylation and embryonic development. This protein localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum and acts as a component of the oligosaccharyl transferase complex which is responsible for N-linked protein glycosylation. This gene is a candidate tumor suppressor gene. Homozygous mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal recessive nonsyndromic mental retardation-7 and in the proliferation and invasiveness of several cancers including metastatic pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer and glioblastoma multiform. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2017]
TUSC3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- intellectual disabilityInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- intellectual disability, autosomal recessive 7Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- autosomal recessive non-syndromic intellectual disabilityInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.9).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.362 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.138 AC: 20936AN: 151730Hom.: 3042 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
20936
AN:
151730
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.138 AC: 21001AN: 151850Hom.: 3057 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.139 AC XY: 10311AN XY: 74196 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
21001
AN:
151850
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
10311
AN XY:
74196
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
15213
AN:
41424
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
1209
AN:
15200
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
242
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
852
AN:
5130
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
402
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
990
AN:
10606
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
32
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
1785
AN:
67888
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
259
AN:
2106
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
751
1503
2254
3006
3757
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
204
408
612
816
1020
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
461
AN:
3476
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.