NM_006897.3:c.497C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_006897.3(HOXC9):c.497C>T(p.Ala166Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000638 in 1,566,912 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A166G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006897.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_006897.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOXC9 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.497C>T | p.Ala166Val | missense | Exon 1 of 2 | ENSP00000302836.4 | P31274 | ||
| ENSG00000273049 | TSL:3 | c.166+14675C>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000476742.1 | V9GYH0 | |||
| HOXC9 | TSL:3 | c.497C>T | p.Ala166Val | missense | Exon 2 of 3 | ENSP00000423861.1 | P31274 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152222Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000266 AC: 5AN: 187640 AF XY: 0.0000474 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000636 AC: 9AN: 1414576Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000712 AC XY: 5AN XY: 702164 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000656 AC: 1AN: 152336Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74488 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at