NM_007294.4:c.2083G>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP6_Very_Strong

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.2083G>T(p.Asp695Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000378 in 1,613,910 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D695G) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000040 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.760

Publications

27 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
Fanconi anemia, complementation group S
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Fanconi anemia
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

BRCA1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

BP6

Variant 17-43093448-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43093448-C-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 54456.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA1	NM_007294.4 link	c.2083G>T	p.Asp695Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 23	ENST00000357654.9	NP_009225.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BRCA1	ENST00000357654.9 link	c.2083G>T	p.Asp695Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 23	1	NM_007294.4	ENSP00000350283.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152164

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000438

AC:

AN:

251166

AF XY:

0.0000442

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000185

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000617

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000404

AC:

AN:

1461746

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000468

AC XY:

AN XY:

727174

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44718

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26130

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39690

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86252

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000187

AC:

AN:

53382

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000414

AC:

AN:

1111938

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000497

AC:

AN:

60390

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.484

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152164

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000135

AC XY:

AN XY:

74338

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41428

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15276

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5198

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4834

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10608

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000294

AC:

AN:

68030

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000282

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000264

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000494

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:14

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1

Uncertain:1Benign:4

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 18, 2019

Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method:curation

IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000263

Mar 02, 2020

BRCAlab, Lund University

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

May 01, 2012

Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

May 29, 2002

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified

Benign:3

Mar 20, 2017

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Aug 28, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: BRCA1 c.2083G>T (p.Asp695Tyr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4.7e-05 in 276880 control chromosomes (gnomAD). This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (4.7e-05 vs 1.00e-03), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. This variant, c.2083G>T, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (Lu_2012, Anczukow_2008). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported (BRCA1: c.5266dup (p.Gln1756ProfsX74) and c.3760A (p.Lys1254X); BRCA2: c.145G>T (p.Glu49X), c.5350_5351delAA (p.Asn1784HisfsX2), and c.1800T>G (p.Tyr600X)), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 16518693, 22476429, 18273839). Nine submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. All submitters classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign.

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Oct 29, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

Mar 09, 2016

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 08, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

NICE approved PARP inhibitor treatment

Benign:1

Jun 26, 2024

Genomics and Molecular Medicine Service, East Genomic Laboratory Hub, NHS Genomic Medicine Service

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

BS3_Strong,BP1,BP5_Very Strong

not provided

Benign:1

Feb 13, 2021

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Malignant tumor of breast

Benign:1

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRCA1 p.Asp695Tyr variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs28897681), LOVD, BIC (2X with unknown clinical importance), and UMD (19X as an unclassified variant). In the UMD database, this variant was identified in two samples with a second pathogenic BRCA2 or BRCA1 mutation (BRCA 1 c.3760A>T (p.Lys1254X) and BRCA2 c.5350 5351delAA (p.Asn1784HisfsX2)), increasing the likelihood that this variant does not have clinical significance. The variant was listed in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing project; however it was identified in only one out of 8600 tested European American chromosomes (frequency: 0.0001). The p.Asp695 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. Three studies predict the variant to affect protein function or confer high risk; however, these predictions are based solely on evolutionary conservation analyses (Burk-Herrick 2006, Fleming 2003, Ramirez 2004). In the HGMD and BIC databases, another variant (c.2083G>A, p.D695N) was also listed with unknown clinical significance, and Greenman (1998) suggests that it may be a polymorphism. In summary, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time, although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as predicted benign.

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.11

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.041

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.0

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.56

D;.;.;.;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.064

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.27

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.14

LIST_S2

Benign

0.85

D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Pathogenic

0.47

MetaRNN

Uncertain

0.50

D;D;D;D;D

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.27

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.7

M;M;.;.;.

PhyloP100

0.76

PrimateAI

Benign

0.27

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-7.0

D;D;D;D;.

REVEL

Uncertain

0.48

Sift

Uncertain

0.0070

D;D;D;D;.

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.012

D;D;D;D;.

Vest4

0.56

ClinPred

0.55

GERP RS

1.4

Varity_R

0.16

gMVP

0.21

Mutation Taster

=74/26

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

Splicevardb

1.0

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over