NM_012385.3:c.125G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_012385.3(NUPR1):c.125G>A(p.Arg42Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000409 in 1,614,194 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R42W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_012385.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_012385.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NUPR1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.125G>A | p.Arg42Gln | missense | Exon 2 of 3 | ENSP00000315559.7 | O60356-1 | ||
| NUPR1 | c.206G>A | p.Arg69Gln | missense | Exon 3 of 4 | ENSP00000546857.1 | ||||
| NUPR1 | TSL:2 | c.179G>A | p.Arg60Gln | missense | Exon 2 of 3 | ENSP00000379003.2 | O60356-2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000175 AC: 44AN: 251086 AF XY: 0.000147 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000390 AC: 57AN: 1461874Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000468 AC XY: 34AN XY: 727240 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152320Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000671 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74488 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at