NM_013339.4:c.911C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_013339.4(ALG6):​c.911C>T​(p.Ser304Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.718 in 1,601,814 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 416,603 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.76 ( 44209 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.71 ( 372394 hom. )

Consequence

ALG6
NM_013339.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.653

Publications

55 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ALG6 (HGNC:23157): (ALG6 alpha-1,3-glucosyltransferase) This gene encodes a member of the ALG6/ALG8 glucosyltransferase family. The encoded protein catalyzes the addition of the first glucose residue to the growing lipid-linked oligosaccharide precursor of N-linked glycosylation. Mutations in this gene are associated with congenital disorders of glycosylation type Ic. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
ITGB3BP (HGNC:6157): (integrin subunit beta 3 binding protein) This gene encodes a transcriptional coregulator that binds to and enhances the activity of members of the nuclear receptor families, thyroid hormone receptors and retinoid X receptors. This protein also acts as a corepressor of NF-kappaB-dependent signaling. This protein induces apoptosis in breast cancer cells through a caspase 2-mediated signaling pathway. This protein is also a component of the centromere-specific histone H3 variant nucleosome associated complex (CENP-NAC) and may be involved in mitotic progression by recruiting the histone H3 variant CENP-A to the centromere. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant 1-63415881-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-63415881-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 95531.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.859 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ALG6NM_013339.4 linkc.911C>T p.Ser304Phe missense_variant Exon 11 of 15 ENST00000263440.6 NP_037471.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ALG6ENST00000263440.6 linkc.911C>T p.Ser304Phe missense_variant Exon 11 of 15 5 NM_013339.4 ENSP00000263440.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.757
AC:
115079
AN:
151958
Hom.:
44156
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.866
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.698
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.765
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.778
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.859
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.864
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.682
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.826
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.684
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.767
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.754
AC:
187926
AN:
249388
AF XY:
0.752
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.870
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.823
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.777
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.861
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.675
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.684
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.750
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.714
AC:
1034456
AN:
1449738
Hom.:
372394
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.718
AC XY:
518209
AN XY:
721786
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.871
AC:
28919
AN:
33196
American (AMR)
AF:
0.816
AC:
36434
AN:
44626
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.781
AC:
20322
AN:
26028
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.836
AC:
32983
AN:
39474
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.858
AC:
73647
AN:
85792
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.676
AC:
36041
AN:
53314
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.825
AC:
4738
AN:
5746
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.687
AC:
756987
AN:
1101632
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.741
AC:
44385
AN:
59930
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.454
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12788
25576
38365
51153
63941
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
19454
38908
58362
77816
97270
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.757
AC:
115188
AN:
152076
Hom.:
44209
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.759
AC XY:
56404
AN XY:
74340
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.867
AC:
35986
AN:
41524
American (AMR)
AF:
0.765
AC:
11704
AN:
15290
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.778
AC:
2699
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.859
AC:
4444
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.864
AC:
4168
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.682
AC:
7190
AN:
10538
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.820
AC:
241
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.684
AC:
46498
AN:
67940
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.768
AC:
1621
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1410
2820
4230
5640
7050
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
854
1708
2562
3416
4270
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.712
Hom.:
131152
Bravo
AF:
0.769
TwinsUK
AF:
0.684
AC:
2537
ALSPAC
AF:
0.693
AC:
2672
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.856
AC:
3769
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.676
AC:
5809
ExAC
AF:
0.750
AC:
91011
Asia WGS
AF:
0.850
AC:
2947
AN:
3468
EpiCase
AF:
0.703
EpiControl
AF:
0.704

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 05, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Oct 04, 2012
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 03, 2021
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

ALG6-congenital disorder of glycosylation 1C Benign:4
Jul 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.044
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.59
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.47
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.39
Eigen
Benign
-0.54
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.41
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0052
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.16
.;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0000017
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
PhyloP100
0.65
PrimateAI
Benign
0.40
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.5
N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.19
Sift
Benign
0.21
T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.58
T;.
Vest4
0.061
MPC
0.32
ClinPred
0.0026
T
GERP RS
3.9
Varity_R
0.062
gMVP
0.40
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Splicevardb
2.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.25
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_AL_spliceai
0.25
Position offset: -8

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4630153; hg19: chr1-63881552; COSMIC: COSV54765155; COSMIC: COSV54765155; API