NM_014070.3:c.786A>G
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 2P and 7B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBP7
The NM_014070.3(C6orf15):c.786A>G(p.Gly262Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000042 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
C6orf15
NM_014070.3 synonymous
NM_014070.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.250
Publications
2 publications found
Genes affected
C6orf15 (HGNC:13927): (chromosome 6 open reading frame 15) Predicted to enable several functions, including collagen V binding activity; fibronectin binding activity; and glycosaminoglycan binding activity. Predicted to be involved in extracellular matrix organization. Predicted to be located in interstitial matrix. Predicted to be active in extracellular matrix. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 6-31111573-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-31111573-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 2656388.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.25 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C6orf15 | NM_014070.3 | c.786A>G | p.Gly262Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 2 of 2 | ENST00000259870.4 | NP_054789.2 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR AF: 0.00000420 AC: 6AN: 1428096Hom.: 0 Cov.: 70 AF XY: 0.00000564 AC XY: 4AN XY: 709792 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
1428096
Hom.:
Cov.:
70
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
709792
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
30210
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
43440
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
24782
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
39614
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
82104
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
52224
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
4800
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
1092498
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
58424
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0.000000), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.242
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
3
4
5
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Feb 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
C6orf15: BP4, BP7 -
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.