NM_014254.3:c.252C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_014254.3(RXYLT1):c.252C>T(p.Ser84Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00204 in 1,608,766 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0021 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

RXYLT1
NM_014254.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.518

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

RXYLT1 (HGNC:13530): (ribitol xylosyltransferase 1) This gene encodes a type II transmembrane protein that is thought to have glycosyltransferase function. Mutations in this gene result in cobblestone lissencephaly. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]

RXYLT1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

muscle-eye-brain disease
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy (congenital with brain and eye anomalies), type a, 10
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy, type A
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

RXYLT1 links:

ENSG00000249753 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000249753 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).

BP6

Variant 12-63781101-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-63781101-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 195295.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.518 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00138 (210/152108) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00249 (169/68008). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00218. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 86 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 8 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RXYLT1	NM_014254.3 link	c.252C>T	p.Ser84Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 6	ENST00000261234.11	NP_055069.1	Q9Y2B1
RXYLT1	XM_047428079.1 link	c.252C>T	p.Ser84Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 5		XP_047284035.1
RXYLT1	NM_001278237.2 link	c.-529C>T		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 2 of 6		NP_001265166.1	Q9Y2B1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RXYLT1	ENST00000261234.11 link	c.252C>T	p.Ser84Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 6	1	NM_014254.3	ENSP00000261234.6		Q9Y2B1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00138

AC:

210

AN:

152108

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000435

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00104

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00248

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000959

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00116

AC:

287

AN:

246960

AF XY:

0.00122

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000500

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000270

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00107

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00212

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00150

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00211

AC:

3077

AN:

1456658

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00209

AC XY:

1516

AN XY:

724594

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000301

AC:

AN:

33230

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000343

AC:

AN:

43782

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26036

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39258

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

85180

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00101

AC:

AN:

53310

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000174

AC:

AN:

5744

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00263

AC:

2917

AN:

1109966

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00133

AC:

AN:

60152

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.479

Heterozygous variant carriers

146

292

439

585

731

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

116

232

348

464

580

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00138

AC:

210

AN:

152108

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00116

AC XY:

AN XY:

74302

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000435

AC:

AN:

41426

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000655

AC:

AN:

15266

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5200

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00104

AC:

AN:

10600

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

314

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00248

AC:

169

AN:

68008

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000959

AC:

AN:

2086

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.506

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00158

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00123

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:4

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

RXYLT1: BP4, BP7 -

Jun 01, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 13, 2017

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.59

CADD

Benign

4.7

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.60

PhyloP100

-0.52

Mutation Taster

=300/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over