NM_014868.5:c.292C>G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BP4
The NM_014868.5(RNF10):c.292C>G(p.Gln98Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000889 in 1,461,878 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014868.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_014868.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNF10 | NM_014868.5 | MANE Select | c.292C>G | p.Gln98Glu | missense | Exon 2 of 17 | NP_055683.3 | ||
| RNF10 | NM_001330474.2 | c.292C>G | p.Gln98Glu | missense | Exon 2 of 17 | NP_001317403.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNF10 | ENST00000325954.9 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.292C>G | p.Gln98Glu | missense | Exon 2 of 17 | ENSP00000322242.4 | ||
| RNF10 | ENST00000413266.6 | TSL:5 | c.292C>G | p.Gln98Glu | missense | Exon 2 of 17 | ENSP00000415682.2 | ||
| RNF10 | ENST00000537997.1 | TSL:4 | c.142C>G | p.Gln48Glu | missense | Exon 3 of 4 | ENSP00000443235.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000889 AC: 13AN: 1461878Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000825 AC XY: 6AN XY: 727240 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at