NM_015102.5:c.2681A>G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_015102.5(NPHP4):c.2681A>G(p.His894Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000656 in 1,608,998 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0038 ( 2 hom., cov: 35)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00033 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

NPHP4
NM_015102.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.466

Publications

6 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

NPHP4 (HGNC:19104): (nephrocystin 4) This gene encodes a protein involved in renal tubular development and function. This protein interacts with nephrocystin, and belongs to a multifunctional complex that is localized to actin- and microtubule-based structures. Mutations in this gene are associated with nephronophthisis type 4, a renal disease, and with Senior-Loken syndrome type 4, a combination of nephronophthisis and retinitis pigmentosa. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]

NPHP4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

nephronophthisis 4
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
Senior-Loken syndrome 4
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
nephronophthisis 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Senior-Loken syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

NPHP4 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0034188628).

BP6

Variant 1-5877229-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-5877229-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 462717.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00377 (575/152378) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0136 (564/41604). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0126. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 265 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 35. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NPHP4	NM_015102.5 link	c.2681A>G	p.His894Arg	missense_variant	Exon 20 of 30	ENST00000378156.9	NP_055917.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NPHP4	ENST00000378156.9 link	c.2681A>G	p.His894Arg	missense_variant	Exon 20 of 30	1	NM_015102.5	ENSP00000367398.4	O75161-1
NPHP4	ENST00000378169.7 link	n.*1582A>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 17 of 27	1		ENSP00000367411.3	D6RA06
NPHP4	ENST00000489180.6 link	n.*229A>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 21 of 33	2		ENSP00000423747.1	O75161-2
NPHP4	ENST00000378169.7 link	n.*1582A>G		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 17 of 27	1		ENSP00000367411.3	D6RA06
NPHP4	ENST00000489180.6 link	n.*229A>G		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 21 of 33	2		ENSP00000423747.1	O75161-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00377

AC:

574

AN:

152262

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0136

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000458

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00143

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000804

AC:

194

AN:

241362

AF XY:

0.000608

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0121

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000384

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000568

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000919

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000340

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000330

AC:

481

AN:

1456620

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000298

AC XY:

216

AN XY:

724044

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0117

AC:

392

AN:

33408

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000541

AC:

AN:

44350

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26026

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000253

AC:

AN:

39526

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000468

AC:

AN:

85448

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52966

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000696

AC:

AN:

5744

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

9.02e-7

AC:

AN:

1109032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000915

AC:

AN:

60120

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.482

Heterozygous variant carriers

106

132

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00377

AC:

575

AN:

152378

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00356

AC XY:

265

AN XY:

74518

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0136

AC:

564

AN:

41604

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000457

AC:

AN:

15310

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5184

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10626

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

292

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68030

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00142

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.500

Heterozygous variant carriers

118

147

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00152

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00425

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0120

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00109

AC:

132

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Senior-Loken syndrome 4

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nephronophthisis

Benign:1

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nephronophthisis 4

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.084

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.55

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.55

CADD

Benign

0.14

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.21

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.12

Eigen

Benign

-1.8

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.8

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.0081

LIST_S2

Benign

0.48

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0034

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.75

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.92

PhyloP100

-0.47

PrimateAI

Benign

0.40

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.0

REVEL

Benign

0.22

Sift

Benign

0.72

Sift4G

Benign

1.0

Polyphen

0.0010

Vest4

0.082

MVP

0.67

MPC

0.076

ClinPred

0.0067

GERP RS

-9.0

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.039

gMVP

0.16

Mutation Taster

=88/12

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over