NM_015360.5:c.196G>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_015360.5(MTREX):c.196G>T(p.Val66Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000348 in 1,608,436 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V66I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_015360.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_015360.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTREX | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.196G>T | p.Val66Leu | missense | Exon 2 of 27 | ENSP00000230640.5 | P42285 | ||
| MTREX | c.196G>T | p.Val66Leu | missense | Exon 2 of 28 | ENSP00000599203.1 | ||||
| MTREX | c.196G>T | p.Val66Leu | missense | Exon 2 of 29 | ENSP00000599201.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000210 AC: 32AN: 152162Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000562 AC: 14AN: 249196 AF XY: 0.0000371 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000165 AC: 24AN: 1456274Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.0000152 AC XY: 11AN XY: 724716 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000210 AC: 32AN: 152162Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000215 AC XY: 16AN XY: 74318 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at