NM_015450.3:c.818G>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points: 7P and 0B. PM2PM5PP3_ModeratePP5
The NM_015450.3(POT1):c.818G>T(p.Arg273Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,216 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R273Q) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_015450.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- pulmonary fibrosis and/or bone marrow failure syndrome, telomere-related, 8Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- tumor predisposition syndrome 3Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- glioma susceptibility 9Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- thyroid gland carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- cerebroretinal microangiopathy with calcifications and cysts 3Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POT1 | NM_015450.3 | c.818G>T | p.Arg273Leu | missense_variant | Exon 10 of 19 | ENST00000357628.8 | NP_056265.2 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461216Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726942 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Tumor predisposition syndrome 3 Pathogenic:1
- -
Neoplasm Other:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at