NM_016021.3:c.685C>G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_016021.3(UBE2J1):c.685C>G(p.Leu229Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.438 in 1,611,968 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 169,668 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016021.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_016021.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBE2J1 | NM_016021.3 | MANE Select | c.685C>G | p.Leu229Val | missense | Exon 8 of 8 | NP_057105.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBE2J1 | ENST00000435041.3 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.685C>G | p.Leu229Val | missense | Exon 8 of 8 | ENSP00000451261.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.532 AC: 80768AN: 151916Hom.: 24650 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.488 AC: 122128AN: 250154 AF XY: 0.491 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.428 AC: 624541AN: 1459936Hom.: 144960 Cov.: 39 AF XY: 0.435 AC XY: 315762AN XY: 726398 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.532 AC: 80885AN: 152032Hom.: 24708 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.535 AC XY: 39734AN XY: 74304 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at