NM_016095.3:c.371G>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_016095.3(GINS2):c.371G>T(p.Arg124Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,598 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R124C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016095.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_016095.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GINS2 | NM_016095.3 | MANE Select | c.371G>T | p.Arg124Leu | missense | Exon 4 of 5 | NP_057179.1 | Q9Y248 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GINS2 | ENST00000253462.8 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.371G>T | p.Arg124Leu | missense | Exon 4 of 5 | ENSP00000253462.3 | Q9Y248 | |
| GINS2 | ENST00000919083.1 | c.386G>T | p.Arg129Leu | missense | Exon 4 of 5 | ENSP00000589142.1 | |||
| GINS2 | ENST00000595355.5 | TSL:3 | c.176G>T | p.Arg59Leu | missense | Exon 4 of 4 | ENSP00000470984.1 | M0R043 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461598Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727094 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at