NM_016124.6:c.697G>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_016124.6(RHD):c.697G>C(p.Glu233Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000876 in 1,379,062 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 194 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as no classification for the single variant (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016124.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_016124.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RHD | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.697G>C | p.Glu233Gln | missense | Exon 5 of 10 | ENSP00000331871.4 | Q02161-1 | ||
| RHD | TSL:1 | c.697G>C | p.Glu233Gln | missense | Exon 5 of 9 | ENSP00000339577.5 | Q02161-4 | ||
| RHD | TSL:1 | c.697G>C | p.Glu233Gln | missense | Exon 5 of 9 | ENSP00000456966.1 | H3BT10 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00428 AC: 566AN: 132150Hom.: 82 Cov.: 21 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00128 AC: 289AN: 225078 AF XY: 0.00115 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000513 AC: 639AN: 1246808Hom.: 111 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000444 AC XY: 276AN XY: 621940 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00430 AC: 569AN: 132254Hom.: 83 Cov.: 21 AF XY: 0.00409 AC XY: 265AN XY: 64794 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at