NM_016156.6:c.1504G>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_016156.6(MTMR2):c.1504G>C(p.Glu502Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0273 in 1,605,020 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,053 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016156.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0369 AC: 5613AN: 151980Hom.: 159 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0348 AC: 8712AN: 250530Hom.: 285 AF XY: 0.0379 AC XY: 5132AN XY: 135374
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0262 AC: 38127AN: 1452924Hom.: 895 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.0285 AC XY: 20649AN XY: 723270
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0369 AC: 5610AN: 152096Hom.: 158 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0398 AC XY: 2956AN XY: 74354
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4B1 Benign:3
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
- -
- -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
- -
- -
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4 Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at