NM_016169.4:c.1006G>A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_016169.4(SUFU):c.1006G>A(p.Ala336Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000211 in 1,613,966 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A336A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000021 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SUFU
NM_016169.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.69

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

SUFU (HGNC:16466): (SUFU negative regulator of hedgehog signaling) The Hedgehog signaling pathway plays an important role in early human development. The pathway is a signaling cascade that plays a role in pattern formation and cellular proliferation during development. This gene encodes a negative regulator of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Defects in this gene are a cause of medulloblastoma. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants.[provided by RefSeq, May 2010]

SUFU Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

medulloblastoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Illumina, Genomics England PanelApp
basal cell nevus syndrome 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P
ocular motor apraxia, Cogan type
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Franklin by Genoox
Joubert syndrome 32
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
Joubert syndrome
Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
apraxia
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
ciliopathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

SUFU links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.059190094).

BP6

Variant 10-102599528-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-102599528-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 453947.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.0000212 (31/1461800) while in subpopulation MID AF = 0.000347 (2/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000609. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 13 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_016169.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	SUFU	NM_016169.4	MANE Select	c.1006G>A	p.Ala336Thr	missense	Exon 8 of 12	NP_057253.2
	SUFU	NM_001178133.2		c.1006G>A	p.Ala336Thr	missense	Exon 8 of 11	NP_001171604.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
SUFU	ENST00000369902.8	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.1006G>A	p.Ala336Thr	missense	Exon 8 of 12	ENSP00000358918.4
SUFU	ENST00000423559.2	TSL:1	c.1006G>A	p.Ala336Thr	missense	Exon 8 of 10	ENSP00000411597.2
SUFU	ENST00000369899.6	TSL:1	c.1006G>A	p.Ala336Thr	missense	Exon 8 of 11	ENSP00000358915.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152166

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000199

AC:

AN:

251254

AF XY:

0.00000736

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000440

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000212

AC:

AN:

1461800

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000179

AC XY:

AN XY:

727200

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39696

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86254

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53398

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000347

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000243

AC:

AN:

1111966

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000166

AC:

AN:

60382

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.477

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152166

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74314

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41450

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15282

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5198

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10604

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68020

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2090

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000676

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000227

ExAC

AF:

0.00000824

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions as Germline

Significance:Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Revision:criteria provided, conflicting classifications

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

not provided (2)

Gorlin syndrome;C0025149:Medulloblastoma (1)

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.055

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.39

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.69

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.89

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.11

Eigen

Benign

-0.65

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.40

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.47

LIST_S2

Benign

0.83

M_CAP

Benign

0.0058

MetaRNN

Benign

0.059

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.34

PhyloP100

3.7

PrimateAI

Benign

0.29

PROVEAN

Benign

0.090

REVEL

Benign

0.048

Sift

Benign

1.0

Sift4G

Benign

0.58

Polyphen

0.0

Vest4

0.17

MutPred

0.28

Gain of phosphorylation at A336 (P = 0.0178)

MVP

0.093

MPC

0.59

ClinPred

0.10

GERP RS

3.7

Varity_R

0.019

gMVP

0.35

Mutation Taster

=91/9

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over