NM_016239.4:c.6052G>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):c.6052G>C(p.Gly2018Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000632 in 1,581,894 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Benign in ClinVar. The gene MYO15A is included in the ClinGen Criteria Specification Registry.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016239.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_016239.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152136Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000151 AC: 3AN: 198172 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000629 AC: 9AN: 1429758Hom.: 0 Cov.: 38 AF XY: 0.00000424 AC XY: 3AN XY: 708190 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152136Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74314 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at