NM_016239.4:c.6612C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):c.6612C>T(p.Arg2204Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000297 in 1,613,742 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016239.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152248Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000883 AC: 22AN: 249010 AF XY: 0.0000887 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000315 AC: 46AN: 1461494Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000289 AC XY: 21AN XY: 727062 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152248Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74382 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
not specified Benign:1
p.Arg2204Arg in exon 30 of MYO15A: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located within the splice consensus sequence. This variant has been identified in 2/115 50 Latino chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.bro adinstitute.org; dbSNP rs752560714). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at