NM_016341.4:c.1729G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_016341.4(PLCE1):c.1729G>A(p.Ala577Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000763 in 1,614,182 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016341.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00418 AC: 636AN: 152198Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00115 AC: 286AN: 249376Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000835 AC XY: 113AN XY: 135274
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000407 AC: 595AN: 1461866Hom.: 6 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000342 AC XY: 249AN XY: 727240
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00418 AC: 636AN: 152316Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00377 AC XY: 281AN XY: 74470
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
- -
- -
See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -
not specified Benign:2
- -
- -
Kidney disorder Uncertain:1
- -
Nephrotic syndrome, type 3 Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at