NM_016343.4:c.4355A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_016343.4(CENPF):​c.4355A>G​(p.Asn1452Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000524 in 1,614,040 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00037 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00054 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CENPF
NM_016343.4 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.951

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CENPF (HGNC:1857): (centromere protein F) This gene encodes a protein that associates with the centromere-kinetochore complex. The protein is a component of the nuclear matrix during the G2 phase of interphase. In late G2 the protein associates with the kinetochore and maintains this association through early anaphase. It localizes to the spindle midzone and the intracellular bridge in late anaphase and telophase, respectively, and is thought to be subsequently degraded. The localization of this protein suggests that it may play a role in chromosome segregation during mitotis. It is thought to form either a homodimer or heterodimer. Autoantibodies against this protein have been found in patients with cancer or graft versus host disease. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
CENPF Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Stromme syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Illumina, Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.021950841).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.00054 (790/1461830) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00067 (745/1111996). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000629. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 377 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 35. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CENPFNM_016343.4 linkc.4355A>G p.Asn1452Ser missense_variant Exon 12 of 20 ENST00000366955.8 NP_057427.3 P49454
CENPFXM_017000086.3 linkc.4355A>G p.Asn1452Ser missense_variant Exon 12 of 20 XP_016855575.1 P49454
CENPFXM_011509082.4 linkc.4355A>G p.Asn1452Ser missense_variant Exon 12 of 19 XP_011507384.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CENPFENST00000366955.8 linkc.4355A>G p.Asn1452Ser missense_variant Exon 12 of 20 1 NM_016343.4 ENSP00000355922.3 P49454
CENPFENST00000706765.1 linkc.4355A>G p.Asn1452Ser missense_variant Exon 12 of 19 ENSP00000516538.1 A0A9L9PXU7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000368
AC:
56
AN:
152210
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000965
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000315
AC:
79
AN:
250920
AF XY:
0.000310
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000277
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000627
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000540
AC:
790
AN:
1461830
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.000518
AC XY:
377
AN XY:
727210
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000896
AC:
3
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44710
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000281
AC:
15
AN:
53402
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000670
AC:
745
AN:
1111996
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000447
AC:
27
AN:
60390
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.468
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
45
90
136
181
226
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
30
60
90
120
150
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000368
AC:
56
AN:
152210
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000363
AC XY:
27
AN XY:
74370
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000965
AC:
4
AN:
41456
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000655
AC:
1
AN:
15272
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5192
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000735
AC:
50
AN:
68042
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000478
AC:
1
AN:
2092
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.512
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
7
11
14
18
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000506
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000348
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00104
AC:
4
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000814
AC:
7
ExAC
AF:
0.000395
AC:
48
EpiCase
AF:
0.000436
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:1
Feb 10, 2017
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Stromme syndrome Uncertain:1
May 16, 2024
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.069
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.64
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.76
CADD
Benign
0.87
DANN
Benign
0.19
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.013
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.96
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.87
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.33
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.71
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0036
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.022
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.97
T
PhyloP100
0.95
PrimateAI
Benign
0.28
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.030
N
REVEL
Benign
0.087
Sift
Benign
1.0
T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T
Polyphen
0.055
B
Vest4
0.066
MVP
0.27
MPC
0.045
ClinPred
0.020
T
GERP RS
0.79
Varity_R
0.016
gMVP
0.046
Mutation Taster
=97/3
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs140952090; hg19: chr1-214816036; API