NM_017622.3:c.326G>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_017622.3(BORCS6):c.326G>C(p.Arg109Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000499 in 1,583,634 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R109W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017622.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_017622.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BORCS6 | TSL:6 MANE Select | c.326G>C | p.Arg109Pro | missense | Exon 1 of 1 | ENSP00000373669.4 | Q96GS4 | ||
| ENSG00000299228 | n.332C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 1 of 1 | ||||||
| ENSG00000279152 | TSL:6 | n.*127C>G | downstream_gene | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152156Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000912 AC: 17AN: 186324 AF XY: 0.000115 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000510 AC: 73AN: 1431360Hom.: 1 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000717 AC XY: 51AN XY: 710996 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152274Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74470 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at