NM_017623.5:c.28C>G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_017623.5(CNNM3):c.28C>G(p.Arg10Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000468 in 1,287,580 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R10W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017623.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_017623.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNNM3 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.28C>G | p.Arg10Gly | missense | Exon 1 of 8 | ENSP00000305449.3 | Q8NE01-1 | ||
| CNNM3 | c.28C>G | p.Arg10Gly | missense | Exon 1 of 8 | ENSP00000617322.1 | ||||
| CNNM3 | c.28C>G | p.Arg10Gly | missense | Exon 1 of 8 | ENSP00000617324.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000454 AC: 69AN: 151906Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000778 AC: 15AN: 19272 AF XY: 0.000907 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000470 AC: 534AN: 1135674Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000493 AC XY: 269AN XY: 545318 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000454 AC: 69AN: 151906Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000391 AC XY: 29AN XY: 74188 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at