Genetic Variant NM_017777.4:c.1498A>G (chr17-58206373-T-C) – ACMG Classification: Benign (-7 pts)

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_017777.4(MKS1):c.1498A>G(p.Met500Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000922 in 1,614,058 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00051 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00096 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

MKS1
NM_017777.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.780

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

MKS1 (HGNC:7121): (MKS transition zone complex subunit 1) The protein encoded by this gene localizes to the basal body and is required for formation of the primary cilium in ciliated epithelial cells. Mutations in this gene result in Meckel syndrome type 1 and in Bardet-Biedl syndrome type 13. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

MKS1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

ciliopathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Meckel syndrome, type 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 13
Inheritance: Unknown, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
Joubert syndrome 28
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Bardet-Biedl syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Joubert syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Joubert syndrome with ocular defect
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Meckel syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

MKS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.

PM1

In a hotspot region, there are 3 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 0 benign, 6 uncertain in NM_017777.4

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.020795196).

BP6

Variant 17-58206373-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-58206373-T-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 241187.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR,Unknown gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_017777.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
MKS1	NM_017777.4	MANE Select	c.1498A>G	p.Met500Val	missense	Exon 17 of 18	NP_060247.2	Q9NXB0-1
MKS1	NM_001321269.2		c.1415A>G	p.His472Arg	missense	Exon 16 of 17	NP_001308198.1	A0A7I2V2M0
MKS1	NM_001321268.2		c.889A>G	p.Met297Val	missense	Exon 16 of 17	NP_001308197.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
MKS1	ENST00000393119.7	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.1498A>G	p.Met500Val	missense	Exon 17 of 18	ENSP00000376827.2	Q9NXB0-1
MKS1	ENST00000537529.7	TSL:1	c.1069A>G	p.Met357Val	missense	Exon 17 of 18	ENSP00000442096.3	A0A0S2Z5Z2
MKS1	ENST00000966002.1		c.1531A>G	p.Met511Val	missense	Exon 17 of 18	ENSP00000636061.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000513

AC:

AN:

152052

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000169

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000971

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000479

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000389

AC:

AN:

249562

AF XY:

0.000421

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000646

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000869

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000795

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000495

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000965

AC:

1410

AN:

1461888

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000927

AC XY:

674

AN XY:

727246

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000209

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000671

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00123

AC:

1373

AN:

1112006

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000447

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.479

Heterozygous variant carriers

168

253

337

421

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

112

168

224

280

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000513

AC:

AN:

152170

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000403

AC XY:

AN XY:

74386

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000168

AC:

AN:

41544

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000261

AC:

AN:

15298

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5142

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4820

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10610

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000971

AC:

AN:

67972

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000474

AC:

AN:

2108

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.493

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000720

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000457

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000809

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00130

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00132

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000389

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000436

EpiControl

AF:

0.000771

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions

Significance:Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Revision:criteria provided, conflicting classifications

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

not provided (2)

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 13 (1)

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 13;C3714506:Meckel syndrome, type 1;C4310705:Joubert syndrome 28 (1)

Inborn genetic diseases (1)

Meckel syndrome, type 1 (1)

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C5979921:Joubert syndrome (1)

MKS1-related disorder (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.084

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.51

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.55

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.87

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.16

Eigen

Benign

-0.48

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.28

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.77

LIST_S2

Benign

0.81

M_CAP

Benign

0.012

MetaRNN

Benign

0.021

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.98

PhyloP100

0.78

PrimateAI

Benign

0.41

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.57

REVEL

Benign

0.056

Sift

Benign

0.41

Sift4G

Benign

0.56

Polyphen

0.0

Vest4

0.060

MVP

0.57

MPC

0.26

ClinPred

0.062

GERP RS

2.7

Varity_R

0.050

gMVP

0.33

Mutation Taster

=91/9

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over