NM_017950.4:c.2892G>A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_017950.4(CCDC40):c.2892G>A(p.Ala964Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0003 in 1,614,106 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00036 ( 0 hom., cov: 34)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00029 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

CCDC40
NM_017950.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.39

Variant links:

Genes affected

CCDC40 (HGNC:26090): (coiled-coil domain 40 molecular ruler complex subunit) This gene encodes a protein that is necessary for motile cilia function. It functions in correct left-right axis formation by regulating the assembly of the inner dynein arm and the dynein regulatory complexes, which control ciliary beat. Mutations in this gene cause ciliary dyskinesia type 15, a disorder due to defects in cilia motility. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2011]

CCDC40 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).

BP6

Variant 17-80095322-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-80095322-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 260964.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.39 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000294 (430/1461716) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00555 (32/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00404. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 222 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CCDC40	NM_017950.4 link	c.2892G>A	p.Ala964Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 20	ENST00000397545.9	NP_060420.2	Q4G0X9-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CCDC40	ENST00000397545.9 link	c.2892G>A	p.Ala964Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 20	5	NM_017950.4	ENSP00000380679.4	Q4G0X9-1
CCDC40	ENST00000574799.5 link	n.2429G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 14 of 16	1
CCDC40	ENST00000572253.5 link	n.3143G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 5 of 6	2
CCDC40	ENST00000575431.1 link	n.536G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 4 of 4	3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000368

AC:

AN:

152272

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000964

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00105

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00403

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00949

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000279

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000385

AC:

AN:

249106

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000399

AC XY:

AN XY:

135310

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000646

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000319

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00288

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000464

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000416

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00116

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000294

AC:

430

AN:

1461716

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000305

AC XY:

222

AN XY:

727164

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000568

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000470

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00409

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000188

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000178

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000844

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000361

AC:

AN:

152390

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000349

AC XY:

AN XY:

74520

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000962

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00104

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00403

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000279

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000893

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000359

EpiCase

AF:

0.000436

EpiControl

AF:

0.000474

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Benign:2

Nov 20, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jan 05, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 15

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:1

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Sep 01, 2022

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

CCDC40: BP4, BP7 -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.83

CADD

Benign

0.48

DANN

Benign

0.46

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over