NM_018055.5:c.588C>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_018055.5(NODAL):​c.588C>G​(p.Leu196Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00138 in 1,614,068 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 31 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0076 ( 18 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00074 ( 13 hom. )

Consequence

NODAL
NM_018055.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.154

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NODAL (HGNC:7865): (nodal growth differentiation factor) This gene encodes a secreted ligand of the TGF-beta (transforming growth factor-beta) superfamily of proteins. Ligands of this family bind various TGF-beta receptors leading to recruitment and activation of SMAD family transcription factors that regulate gene expression. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate the mature protein, which regulates early embryonic development. This protein is required for maintenance of human embryonic stem cell pluripotency and may play a role in human placental development. Mutations in this gene are associated with heterotaxy, a condition characterized by random orientation of visceral organs with respect to the left-right axis. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]
NODAL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • heterotaxy, visceral, 5, autosomal
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
  • situs inversus
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (REVEL=0.146).
BP6
Variant 10-70435589-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-70435589-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 260991.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.154 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00758 (1155/152284) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0262 (1089/41556). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0249. There are 18 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 532 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1155 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NODALNM_018055.5 linkc.588C>G p.Leu196Leu synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 3 ENST00000287139.8 NP_060525.3 Q96S42
NODALNM_001329906.2 linkc.189C>G p.Leu63Leu synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 3 NP_001316835.1
NODALXM_024448028.2 linkc.189C>G p.Leu63Leu synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 3 XP_024303796.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NODALENST00000287139.8 linkc.588C>G p.Leu196Leu synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 3 1 NM_018055.5 ENSP00000287139.3 Q96S42
NODALENST00000414871.1 linkc.423C>G p.Leu141Leu synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 3 1 ENSP00000394468.1 H7C0E4
ENSG00000280401ENST00000624563.1 linkn.761G>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 1 of 1 6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00758
AC:
1153
AN:
152166
Hom.:
18
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0262
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00314
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00335
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00203
AC:
509
AN:
250942
AF XY:
0.00139
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0264
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00159
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000150
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000979
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000737
AC:
1078
AN:
1461784
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.000635
AC XY:
462
AN XY:
727202
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0245
AC:
820
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00183
AC:
82
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000116
AC:
1
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53350
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00173
AC:
10
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000630
AC:
70
AN:
1111984
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00156
AC:
94
AN:
60388
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.469
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
85
170
254
339
424
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
30
60
90
120
150
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00758
AC:
1155
AN:
152284
Hom.:
18
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00714
AC XY:
532
AN XY:
74472
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0262
AC:
1089
AN:
41556
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00314
AC:
48
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000162
AC:
11
AN:
68024
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00331
AC:
7
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
57
113
170
226
283
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000559
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00817
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
Jan 24, 2018
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Heterotaxy, visceral, 5, autosomal Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Dec 24, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Holoprosencephaly sequence Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
CADD
Benign
2.0
DANN
Benign
0.92
PhyloP100
0.15
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2231959; hg19: chr10-72195345; API