NM_018109.4:c.1637G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_018109.4(MTPAP):c.1637G>A(p.Ser546Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00166 in 1,614,140 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018109.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- mitochondrial diseaseInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- spastic ataxia 4Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00206 AC: 313AN: 152148Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00247 AC: 620AN: 251390 AF XY: 0.00236 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00162 AC: 2368AN: 1461874Hom.: 10 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00162 AC XY: 1176AN XY: 727244 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00206 AC: 313AN: 152266Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00250 AC XY: 186AN XY: 74442 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
MTPAP-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at